BLOG
Guides · Blog
Evidence, Guides, and Insights.
Selection and comparison topics
Choosing a short-range single-point LiDAR
All three models output one distance point. Check target reflectivity, real distance, mounting environment and power first, then compare weight, power, protection and field of view; the same headline range does not imply the same result for every target or environment.
Explore selection rationale →Choosing AD2-S-X3 or LR10 for 3D perception
Both provide spatial perception data, but differ substantially in range, coverage, interface, size and target platform. Separate long-range automotive environment sensing from close-range industrial robot or volume sensing before checking software and mounting.
Explore selection rationale →Choosing by industrial interface, power and distance
Confirm the controller interface, cable run and supply first, then compare range, update rate and protection. Model suffixes represent different interface paths; do not assume all three support the same buses.
Explore selection rationale →Balancing range, weight and environment at long distance
Set the working distance and margin for the real target reflectivity first, then compare weight, enclosure, protection, interface and update rate. These are current specification differences, not a performance ranking without matched-condition tests.
Explore selection rationale →Filtering 10–50 m tasks by range and protection
This topic addresses the requested 10–50 m selection question, but not every candidate reaches 50 m. Eliminate by real working distance first, then compare weight, enclosure, protection, interface and power.
Explore selection rationale →Line-pattern sensing or multi-channel distance at close range
Both products can serve close-range sensing, but their output forms differ: TF-NOVA uses a line-pattern spot for area ranging input, while NOVA20 outputs channel-tagged distances in multiple directions. Decide which data form the system actually needs first.
Explore selection rationale →